Having been a keen observer over the past few years for reasons forthcoming, it seems as if there is a new "trend" developing in Identified Adoptions. In connection with this growth, the ensuing shortages has led to a high demand for available newborn children. In turn, this need created a lucrative cash-producing niche in what I call the the "Baby Trade" and the marketing of newborn placements. The evident proof is primarily recognizable by looking to the "Hollywood" crowd whom have adopted, and suffer the public paparazzi label of having done so because it is the "chic" thing to do in Beverly Hills.
I question not, __ anybody's motives to provide a home to a child. My thoughts concern the aftermath. Despite ever increasing record numbers, adoptions continue to be viewed with jaded eyes as legislators gloss over the many troubled areas that need urgent attention. It is especially apparent when it comes to the topic of birthfather's rights; these are the issues caught in a gloaming. As an example, take the state of New Jersey; it is in dire need of legislative change. In 1998 this state implemented a law that was supposed to curtail horrific judicial decisions that reversed child placements. However, what this law did, was to strip the biological birthfather of all rights. I have discovered that this statute has a loophole one can drive the proverbial truck through. The law gives adoption attorneys the power to play god, or at least act as if given devine right. Likened to King David himself, the attorney can obstruct justice, lie, and blockade critical testimony from good samaritan witnesses who are left thinking they blew the whistle on child adoption fraud. These few attorneys who practice law in this manner, do so without regard for the triad that is adoption. They are not of same mold, nor have the wisdom of a wise King Solomon. In their support I have proven are the powers that be in this "Garden State."
With that in mind, this point is illustrated in a N.J. state Supreme Court letter concerning an ethics charge I filed with the Office of Attorney Ethics, it stated, quote, "your greivance even if proven does not constitute unethical conduct or incapacity." This was after I had proved an adoption attorney had lied to same Supreme Court on two seperate occasions. All in all, what this statute provides is legal sanctuary for unsrcupulous attorneys. A safe haven for those that get caught working far outside the boundries of the ethical placement of newborn children.
Of note, everything relayed in this blog is backed up with official documentation, as they concern the wrongful adoption of my son. At this point and time I have put Children of the World Adoption Agency, Verona, New Jersey out of business. It has taken me four years to revocate the license of this Rosie O'Donnell funded, yet corrupt adoption agency. This agency's executive director, Veronica Serio is a proven liar. It is also hard to believe this woman who has 35 years in the adoption field had actually helped the esteemed Seton Hall Professesor James Boskey write New Jersey adoption law. This true but seemingly unbelievable story is rife with deciet and subtrefuge on the part of the DHS of New Jersey and Children of the World Inc. The adoption attorney meanwhile, whose actions are of the most deplorable nature, remains untarnished in this adoption quagmire. It is a travesty since his works are santioned by the these same laws that led to the closure of the adoption agency.
Although, none of this would of happened if the birthmother had kept the child. Suffice to say, she had her problems. This leaves the subject of the birthfather, and his role.
To stand here and tell you I was an angel, will not take place. However, in my heart I would have never allowed my son to be adopted. It would be inconceiavable in thought no matter how dire the circumstances. I say this because one of the reasons why the birthmother said she orchestrateded her ruse to deceive me, was for the fact that I have Parkinsons deasese. Although there were monetary issues involved, [This is subject is a book in itself] she said she did it for the betterment of the child.
For now, I will leave this story in mid-air if you will. I am in dire need of an, "dare I say it" attorney myself if there is chance to one day see my son. So now I ask that if you were interested further, to please purchase a copy of my book. I thank you for your time. I also would like to thank Laura Christianson for this fine venue to "cry my river".
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This